Kampf-der-kinderklaubehörde » Kinderklau mit unterstützung vom Staat » Dein erstes Forum » Neues Thema erstellen Neues Thema erstellen Betreff [b][/b] [i][/i] [u][/u] [code][/code] [quote][/quote] [spoiler][/spoiler] [url][/url] [img][/img] [video][/video] Smileys [pre][

Raiders NewsRaiders GM -- Carr 'is a franchise quarterback'At the NFL combine Wednesday Womens Bo Jackson Jersey , Raiders general manager Mike Mayock said he believes Derek Carr is a franchise quarterback, but also noted..."WhiteFanposts Fanshots Raiders StoriesScheduleRosterStatsYahoo Raiders NewsYahoo Raiders Team PageYahoo Raiders ReportYahoo Raiders Depth ChartYahoo Raiders TransactionsYahoo Raiders PhotosOdds About Masthead Community Guidelines StubHub 鉁昐ilver Mining 3/4: Raiders GM Mike Mayock says Derek Carr ‘is a Franchise QB’New,202commentsPSTShareTweetShareShareSilver Mining 3/4: Raiders GM Mike Mayock says Derek Carr ‘is a Franchise QB’Kirby Lee-USA TODAY SportsRaiders NewsRaiders GM -- Carr 'is a franchise quarterback'At the NFL combine Wednesday, Raiders general manager Mike Mayock said he believes Derek Carr is a franchise quarterback, but also noted Oakland has a lot of work to do in the offseason.Jon Gruden, Oakland Raiders hold the key to the 2019 NFL draftWith three picks in the first round, the Raiders could go in a number of different directions as they look to reshape their roster.Should the Raiders Consider Trading Former Pro Bowl QB Derek Carr? | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and HighlightsIt's easy to understand whyOakland Raidershead coach/shot-caller Jon Gruden might be tempted to trade purported franchise quarterbackDerek Carr . And it's easy to believe such a trade will happen...Peter King on Antonio Brown Trade: 'Raiders Make the Most Sense' ThePittsburgh Steelerscould tradeAntonio Brownas early as this week, and theOakland Raiderscould be the favorite to make a move.Should the Raiders trade up to secure LB Devin Bush?Should the Raiders trade up to secure LB Devin Bush?AFC WestChiefs News: Here come the Dee Ford trade scenarios - Arrowhead PrideChiefs headlines for Monday, March 4.Franchise tag fight could be looming for Chiefs and Dee Ford – ProFootballTalkThe Chiefs have franchise-tagged Dee Ford as a linebacker. He'll likely be a defensive end in the team's new defense. And that could spark a fight over whether he should be tagged as a linebacker or as a defensive end.3 Los Angeles Chargers takeaways from NFL Combine workouts SundayHere are three Los Angeles Chargers takeaways from NFL Combine workouts Sunday.Potential Chargers perform well Sunday at NFL CombineThe Chargers will look long and hard at a defensive lineman this year. Even after selecting Justin Jones in the third round of the 2018 draft. The team is looking at the possibility of no Corey Liuget, Damion Square, Darius Philon, or Brandon Mebane. That is over a thousand snaps to replace in 2019.Another pass rusher? Yes, Broncos could use depth after Von Miller, Bradley Chubb. – The Denver PostIf the Broncos needed immediate, every-down help at outside linebacker, their decision would have been made Sunday by watching Mississippi State’s Montez Sweat run the 40-yard dash at the scouting combine.What player would you like to see the Denver Broncos trade for? - Mile High ReportIf the Denver Broncos could make a trade for one big-named player this offseason, who would you like to see them go after?NFL NewsNFL combine weird questions: Kris Boyd asked if he has two testiclesContinuing in the long line of prospects being asked strange questions at the combine, Kris Boyd was posed a query that caught him off-guard.NFL combine: Clemson's Clelin Ferrell wants all to know his nameClelin Ferrell had a team-high 11.5 sacks for Clemson last season and could be the first of the Tigers' 3 star defensive linemen draftedWhy the NFL combine is buzzing over a hard-throwing QB who's 'messing up people's money' - AOL NewsPhysically exceptional quarterback makes a name for himself by throwing 'lightning bolts' at annual skill tests for NFL prospects.Dwayne Haskins: 2019 NFL draft’s most pro-ready QB? | SI.comAs Kyler Murray Mania continued to swirl, Ohio State’s Dwayne Haskins—under the watchful gaze of his Buckeyes coach—did all the right things at the combine to show NFL teams why he’s the most pro-ready QB, and maybe safest bet, in the 2019 draft. With Raiders fans taking aim at old/new coach Jon Gruden, still fairly new owner Mark Davis decided to grant an interview aimed at shifting accountability from someone who (in theory) can be fired to someone who can’t be.Davis, in a conversation with Paul Gutierrez of ESPN.com, addressed the controversial decisions to trade pass rusher Khalil Mack and receiver Amari Cooper. The message from Davis: Don’t blame Gruden, blame me.Davis said that the team initially tried to sign Mack to an extension in 2017 Bo Jackson Jersey , after making quarterback Derek Carr the highest paid (for a brief time) player in the league. The Raiders offered, according to Davis, a package that would have made Mack the highest paid (also possibly for a brief time) player in the league. Mack and his agent, Joel Segal, passed.“[T]hey decided they didn’t want to do it that early,” Davis told Gutierrez. “They would wait.”So wait they did. Then came the unofficial hiring of Jon Gruden, the firing of Jack Del Rio, the official hiring of Gruden, and a single conversation in January between Gruden and Mack.“That’s the last time Jon and Khalil talked,” Davis said.As previously explained here and elsewhere, the Raiders tried in February to extend Mack. The two sides weren’t able to reach an accord. At that point, as PFT has heard it, the Raiders decided to spend their money on other players, leaving them with a budget that provided only for the $13.846 million that Mack was due to make under the fifth year of his rookie deal.“From that point on, [Mack] would not talk to anyone in our organization,” Davis said. “Not [G.M.] Reggie [McKenzie], not Jon, not anybody.”Davis insists that Gruden wanted to keep Mack around.“Jon wanted him,” Davis said. “Everybody thinks that Jon’s the one who wanted to get rid of him. Jon wanted him badly. Why wouldn’t you want this guy? Reggie wanted him badly. And I wanted him badly, too. But, if in fact we were going to give the type of money that we were going to give to him, and we had Derek on that type of a [contract], how were we going to go ahead and build this football team, with all the holes that we had?”But they could have done it, if they’d wanted to do it. The salary cap keeps going up, and increases in the quarterback market already has relegated Carr’s deal to second-tier status. The Raiders could have found a way to pay Mack https://www.raiderslockerroom.com/authentic-antonio-brown-jersey , sooner or later.The Raiders opted for later, squatting on Mack during the final year of his rookie deal and assuming that he’d show up and play. Davis confirmed that this was indeed the approach.“My thought was, ‘Listen, he signed a five-year contract, if he’s the type of guy that I think he is, he’s going to honor that contract,'” Davis said. “And he’s going to come in and play for the $13 million for this year and then we’ll work for him during the year and get it. Word came back through certain players that know him and talk to him and know me as well, that he wasn’t going to come in. He was going to do the Le'Veon Bell [holdout]. At that point, I said, ‘Eff it. The guy hasn’t talked to anybody. We’ve got to do something.'”Davis mentioned a second time the concept of Mack “honoring” the fifth year of his contract. But the reality continues to be that there are two types of contracts that apply to NFL players: Their individual contract with the team, and the broader contract that governs the relationship between all players and the league.聽Under the latter contract, Mack and all players have rights. Mack exercised those rights. And the Raiders blinked, once they knew that the Rams had given defensive tackle Aaron Donald $22.5 million per year, and that the Raiders would never do the same for Mack.So, basically, Mack leveraged his rights under the labor contract, even if it technically meant not “honoring” his obligations under his specific employment contract with the Raiders.After taking on Mack and losing badly, Davis decided he didn’t want to go 0-2 by taking on Cooper, who also is represented by Segal, and experiencing the same outcome.“It might not have been the right decision, but the other point to this whole thing is that Segal is also the agent for Amari Cooper,” Davis said. “And we knew the same situation was coming up the next year. It wasn’t just one layer of chess; it was two layers of chess.”Call it chess or checkers or chicken, the Raiders lost. And now Davis admits it. Which sends a dangerous message to all other players and agents who will be negotiating with the Raiders in the coming year.Bottom line? You can play hardball with the Raiders, and you can win. Big.