Dein erstes Forum » Tight end Jimmy Graham‘s return to Seattle

Rashan Gary Jersey , where he played three years before signing with Green Bay, did not go as he had hoped.Graham caught just one pass (on his only target) for 13 yards and had to leave early with an injury that will reportedly force him to miss several weeks.In the Packers’ first nine games, Graham had played at least 68 percent of the offensive snaps in each game (the low coming last week), and usually 80 percent or more. Because of the injury, Graham had just 21 snaps (43 percent) against the Seahawks.More Packers coverage from FOX Sports WisconsinBucks’ Wes Matthews loves Wisconsin, is a Vikings fanPreview: Packers look to slow Vikings’ revitalized run gameTop Tweets: Yelich thanks fans for support after season-ending injuryAmos sparks rebuilt Packers defense in debutPackers to be tested again by familiar foe in Zimmer, VikingsIn Graham’s absence, Lance Kendricks saw a slight uptick in playing time, getting 26 snaps (53 percent). Kendricks usually is for about one-third of Green Bay’s plays, give or take a little http://www.greenbaypackersteamonline.com/jace-sternberger-jersey , although last Sunday against Miami he was in for a season-high 61 percent.Marcedes Lewis (10 snaps, 20 percent) and Robert Tonyan (3 snaps, six percent) were not the answer for Mike McCarthy in trying to fill the void left by Graham.Instead, Green Bay went heavy with wide receivers, even with Randall Cobb sidelined and Trevor Davis and J’Mon Moore relegated to special teams.That left the triumvirate of Davante Adams, Equanimeous St. Brown and Marquez Valdes-Scantling. The three were on the field for all but 10 plays.Valdes-Scantling missed just one snap and St. Brown six, but both only finished with one catch (St. Brown had four targets, Valdes-Scantling three). Adams missed just three snaps and on the 46 plays he was in on was targets 12 times (or 26 percent of Green Bay’s plays), finishing with 10 catches for 166 yards.<em>Other notes from Sunday’s snap counts:</em>— Green Bay ran just 49 offensive plays; Seattle had 70.— Remember when Aaron Jones couldn’t get snaps and then there was some kind of committee? Well, Jones was in on 44 offensive plays (90 percent) and fellow running back Jamaal Williams just four (8 percent).— Safety Josh Jones and linebacker Blake Martinez were the only two defenders to appear in every play http://www.greenbaypackersteamonline.com/darnell-savage-jr.-jersey , although safety Tramon Williams and cornerbacks Jaire Alexander and Josh Jackson missed just one play each.— Claimed off waivers on Nov. 5, safety Ibraheim Campbell got into his first game for the Packers, playing 11 defensive snaps (19 percent) and nine on special teams (29 percent). Campbell also played in one game with the New York Giants and four with Dallas earlier this season.OFFENSEPLAYERPLAYS (49)%Bakhtiari40100%Bell49100%Bulaga49100%Linsley49100%Rodgers49100%Taylor49100%Valdes-Scantling4898%D. Adams4694%A. Jones4490%St. Brown4388%Kendricks2653%Graham2143%Lewis1020%J. Williams48%Tonyan36%DEFENSEPLAYERPLAYS (70)%J. Jones70100%Martinez70100%Jackson6999%T. Williams6999%Alexander6999%Fackrell5883%Clark5781%Matthews5477%Lowry4767%Morrison4057%Daniels3449%Gilbert2739%Brown2536%M. Adams2333%Breeland2029%Greene1420%Campbell1119%Lancaster1116% In 2018, Green Bay’s defense struggled to give its offense a chance to come back, as evidenced by opposing quarterback stats." />Skip to main contentclockmenumore-arrownoyesAcme Packing Company homepageHorizontal - WhiteAcme Packing Companya Green Bay Packers communityFollow Acme Packing Company online:Follow Acme Packing Company on TwitterFollow Acme Packing Company on FacebookFollow Acme Packing Company on InstagramLog in or sign upLog InSign UpSite searchSearchSearchAcme Packing Company main menuFanpostsFanshotsSectionsPackersOddsAboutMastheadCommunity GuidelinesStubHubMoreAll 321 blogs on Horizontal - WhiteFanposts Fanshots Sections The APC PodcastPackers Film RoomFantasy Football AdviceCDTShare this storyShare this on FacebookShare this on TwitterShareAll sharing optionsShareAll sharing options for:Packers’ pass defense must improve when playing from behind in 2019TwitterFacebookRedditPocketFlipboardEmailPhoto by Larry Radloff/Icon Sportswire via Getty ImagesSometimes in sports, the eyeball test and the numerical data align when comparing subjects. For the Green Bay Packers, this was not a positive thing when judging the defense’s inability to get critical stops in 2018. And it was not just on third downs to get off the field, but when the opponent was leading the ballgame. For a second consecutive season, the Packers’ defense allowed a quarterback rating of over 100 according to Pro Football Reference. The 100.9 overall rating ranked Green Bay fifth-worst in the NFL and was a telling number for the challenges the defense encountered. But perhaps the most staggering situational opposing quarterback rating came when the Packers were trailing. The Green Bay defense gave up an astronomical 111.8 rating through 373 total plays when behind, while the average NFL defense allowed just a 95.4 rating in a slightly lower number of plays. While the Packers also fell below the league average when the game was tied or in Green Bay’s favor Rashan Gary Jersey , the figures were much closer to the mean.If the Packers are to contend for a championship again in 2019, the Packers’ defense must do its part to keep the team from digging a deeper hole when trailing. When comparing this statistic from 2018 to successful Packer defenses of the past, the results are not surprisingly far apart. The 2011 Green Bay team that posted a 15-1 record clamped down when trying to catch up, allowing just a 64.5 rating. The Super Bowl team of 2010 was especially strong in this regard with a 33.0 mark. The Packers’ 1996 defense, one that ranked among the league’s best, brought the Lombardi Trophy home with an impressive 71.8 rating. Without delaying the point, Green Bay’s most competitive teams put up significantly more resistance against quarterbacks when attempting a comeback. And it was not just the quarterback rating stat that tortured the 2018 squad. Completion percentages and passing yards per attempt also were disproportionate from teams of the past when the Packers were trailing.Opponent Splits with Packers Trailing (Pro Football Reference)SeasonCompletion %Yards/AttemptQB RatingSeasonCompletion %Yards/AttemptQB RatingThe struggles in each of these categories surely contributed to the Packers’ defensive third-down issues and finishing with a 3-5 record when trailing after three quarters. While injuries impacted the Packers’ pass rushers and secondary last season, they do not fully excuse the team’s poor defensive play.Quarterbacks moved the ball with relative ease and efficiency when playing with the lead.While Green Bay’s splash free agent signings and draft picks should help alleviate some of those problems in 2019, the team’s lack of consistency when trailing must be corrected to make another postseason run.